Tag Archives: constitution

The GOP’s Theoconservatism Problem


“The impact of the sound bite mentality which you find in both parties…is there’s been a debasing of the system. Because if you listen to these — I call them the Stepford candidates — on both sides in these debates the only two candidates that speak clearly are the ones they call the kooks.” Victor Gold to Bill Moyer in 2007 interview

 The GOP needs a dose of libertarianism and much less social conservatism if it can ever  honestly claim to be conservative again. Victor Gold, who served as Press Secretary to Barry Goldwater and speechwriter for Reagan and Bush 41, wrote a book entitled, Invasion of the Body Snatchers: How the Holy-Rollers and the Neo-Cons Destroyed the GOP. Victor Gold understood a problem for the GOP that would make proclamations of limited government and fiscal responsibility hypocritical and at odds with the desires of its social conservatives. Gold’s diagnosis is prescient; as the GOP has gone on to lose two more Presidential elections since the publication of Invasion of the Party Snatchers in 2007. His book remains a better diagnosis of why the GOP lost 4 of the last 6 Presidential elections and may continue to do so than Reince Priebus’ $10 million “autopsy” written in platitudinous consultancy speak.

Questions remain after Rand Paul’s filibuster

rand-paul-14TAMPA, March 10, 2013 – First, the good news. Kentucky Senator Rand Paul squared off in a 13-hour game of chicken with the White House on Wednesday. At stake was the bedrock American principle that no one will be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. Early Thursday morning, the White House blinked.

“It has come to my attention that you have now asked an additional question: “Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?” The answer to that question is no. Sincerely, Eric H. Holder, Jr.”

It took “a month and a half and a root canal” to get that carefully worded answer, according to Senator Paul, and even then some obvious questions remained.

Does the president have the authority to use manned aircraft to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil? How about a rifle? A bow and arrow?

Perhaps due to the popular support for Paul’s filibuster, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney attempted to clean up Holder’s overqualified answer.

The Supreme Court Fails to Protect Economic Liberty, Again Occupational licensing abuse gets a pass from the high court.

Does the Constitution protect the right to earn a living free from arbitrary and unnecessary government interference? James Madison, the document’s chief architect, thought it did. “That is not a just government,” Madison wrote, “where arbitrary restrictions, exemptions, and monopolies deny to part of its citizens that free use of their faculties, and free choice of their occupations.” Rep. John Bingham (R-Ohio), the author of section one of the 14th Amendment, which forbids state governments from depriving any person of “life, liberty, or property, without due process of law,” thought so too. According to Bingham, the 14th Amendment secures the right “to work in an honest calling and contribute by your toil in some sort to the support of your fellowmen, and to be secure in the enjoyment of the fruits of your toil.” …………


Read Article Here…

Earth to Rick Santorum: Libertarians Founded the United States

Andrew Napolitano recently showed a clip in which Rick Santorum explained his views on libertarianism. His comments are also instructive in understanding his animosity (politically) towards Ron Paul. Santorum said:

“One of the criticisms I make is to what I refer to as more of a Libertarianish right. They have this idea that people should be left alone, be able to do whatever they want to do, government should keep our taxes down and keep our regulations low, that we shouldn’t get involved in the bedroom, we shouldn’t get involved in cultural issues. That is not how traditional conservatives view the world. There is no such society that I am aware of, where we’ve had radical individualism and that it succeeds as a culture.”

As David Boaz pointed out in the interview with Napolitano, Santorum seems to oppose a basic American principle- the right to the pursuit of happiness. I agree with him on this, but there is something even more fundamental here than that. It has to do with the conservative philosophy itself. One of the statements that Santorum makes is true. “That is not how traditional conservatives view the world.”

There is a great disconnect between average Americans who refer to themselves as “conservatives” and the small group of politicians and politically-connected businessman who likewise refer to themselves. The members of the former group believe in the founding principles of the United States, including the inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. They believe that these rights are endowed by their Creator. In other words, they preexist the government. They are not created by the government. It is the government’s one and only job to protect those rights and when the government fails to protect them and instead violates them, it is the duty of the people to alter or abolish the government.


Read Article Here…

Constitutional attorney: Guantanamo ‘nearly impossible to close’ thanks to NDAA

The U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba will not be closing any time soon thanks to President Barack Obama’s approval of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), a constitutional attorney who’s represented terrorism suspects told Raw Story this week in an exclusive interview.

Even though President Barack Obama made closing Guantanamo one of his core campaign promises in the lead-up to the presidential election in 2008, that promise now appears to be “nearly impossible” to fulfill thanks to provisions in the new laws, Baher Azmy, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights, explained. ……….


Read Article Here…


Obama’s change: From kidnapping and torture to assassination

Just say no to marijuana convictions

Should juries vote “not guilty” on low-level marijuana charges to send a message about our country’s insane marijuana arrest policy?

Jury nullification is a constitutional doctrine that allows juries to acquit defendants who are technically guilty but who don’t deserve punishment. As Paul Butler wrote recently in The New York Times, juries have the right and power to use jury nullification to protest unjust laws.

Mr. Butler points out that nullification was credited with ending our country’s disastrous alcohol Prohibition as more and more jurors refused to send their neighbors to jail for a law they didn’t believe in. He says we need to do the same with today’s marijuana arrests. …………………


Read Article Here…


Liberty Pulse Archive



Mike Church’s Christmas with the Founding Fathers Radio Stream


Mandeville, LA – Mike Church Announces Christmas With The Founding Fathers, A LIVE, 24/7 internet broadcast featuring Mike’s critically acclaimed movies (audio versions) “The Road To Independence, The Spirit of ’76, The Fame of Our Fathers and Mike’s Constitution Day and Independence Day in depth discussions and interviews on those dates with: Kevin Gutzman, Jack Hunter and more.

Listen to the stream on iPhone

Listen on other Smartphones

Listen via LiveStream app

This radio stream is the future of American history on the internet. If you have a special request for an event you’d like Mike to cover for future broadcasts or questions about support and advertising the Founding Father Film Radio stream.

In 2012, Mike Church will begin work on his next movie project and will be presenting an exciting investment opportunity for shrewd investors who see the opportunity that Conservative Themed Films present-Stay tuned and Merry Christmas.

Ron Paul’s Winning Secret – the ‘Unified Field Theory of Constitutionalism’

Below is a good article from CNN reporter about Ron Paul in Iowa. What stuck him is something most Ron Paul Supporters know and of course Dr. Paul has been saying for years “Freedom is Popular”. Now the MSM is having to report the exciting story of the century as it really is that the Ron Paul Revolution is changing the world by bringing people together under principle not party and not special interests. This reporter calls it the ‘Unified Theory of Constitutionalism’ which is a fun accurate description.

(CNN) — The wild card in the Iowa caucus is Ron Paul, the libertarian congressman from Texas. As with all wild cards, his place in the top tier of candidates is itself unlikely and his ultimate effect on the Republican presidential nomination is unpredictable. But based on what I saw during my trip to Iowa earlier this month, no one should count Paul out.

His supporters are famously dedicated, and their numbers have only grown since his 2008 campaign. They are sometimes stereotyped as university students with a penchant for pot-legalization and political debate, but at a town hall in Marshalltown, Iowa, last Saturday morning, I saw a predominantly blue collar, middle-aged crowd listening raptly to Paul discuss his unified field theory of constitutionalism. Roughly 20 people from the crowd of 100 stuck around after the talk to organize for the caucus.

Organization matters in the Iowa caucus, and Paul’s volunteers are going to show up in force. One of the great questions of this campaign is whether retail politics is dead — after all, Rick Santorum is the only candidate who has visited all 99 counties in Iowa, and he’s been stuck in the mid-single digits for most of the campaign…

Read Article Here…

Obama Drops Veto Threat Over Military Authorization Bill After Revisions

WASHINGTON — President Obamawill not veto a military authorization bill that contains several disputed provisions about the treatment of terrorism prisoners, the White House announced Wednesday, signaling a likely end to a political battle over detainees and executive power.

The administration had threatened to veto versions of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 passed by the House and the Senate, arguing that provisions would open the door for the military to perform policing functions inside the United States, and that they would infringe on executive branch powers.

But the White House said in a statement that adjustments made by a House-Senate conference committee had sufficiently addressed its concerns…

Read Article Here…